Talk:List of concrete and visual poets

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

This is meant to become a comprehensive list of concrete and visual poets. Please feel free to add names of those writers and artists actively working in this area. For a definition of concrete and visual poetry, please take a look at the Concrete Poetry Wikipedia entry.

Thanks so much Matthew and Paul for helping the list! Jesse

Rounding out nicely in only a few days! 9/12/2006.

If there are no articles on these people in red, are they real, is someone just making up names?? I will be deleting the dead red links and moving them to the discussion page until such time as someone writes a legitimate article. WayneRay (talk) 16:47, 16 August 2008 (UTC)WayneRay[reply]

Dear Mr. WayneRay, Did you happen to Google any of those "dead links"? Here is another case of ignorance strutting its stuff at Wikipedia. I throw my hands up in despair. Jesse —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.151.64.61 (talk) 08:27, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is not up to me to Google any of these. The point being is that whomever added the link should have written or composed a real article (which would show up in blue) as it stands only three have been updated so far. Any one can make up a name and add it to a list, it will show up in red and won't make it real or knowledgable WayneRay (talk) 14:04, 27 October 2008 (UTC)WayneRay[reply]

It's ok to have people on a list who do not have Wikipedia entries provided a reference to a reliable source is provided verifying their notability with an inline citation. SpinningSpark 23:47, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability only through the web seems to be a bit strange. There are Anthologies (Solt, Williams etc.), and tons of stuff has been writen on the subject: no need at all to rely on the net alone (although it is nice to have at least some proof that somebody actually does exist somewhere. But: being mentioned or not being mentioned here cannot be a valid test to see if someone is a known, interesting, important poet or not.--Radh (talk) 07:24, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]