Talk:List of triplanes

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Classes of triplane[edit]

Resolved

In the default list given at WP:AVILIST, the only class relevant here is "Propeller". That seems a bit pointless, so I have not added it in. We can agree a more useful approach to classification here. Some options I can think of:

Undercarriage (landing gear): Landplane, Floatplane, Seaplane, Amphibian.
Wing design: Equal-span, Short upper wing, Short lower wing.
Abandon the Class column altogether.

My preference is the first, to classify by undercarriage.

Do other folks have any preferences, comments or suggestions to add? — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 10:49, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Given the rather number of triplanes, I see no reason to subdivide them into classes. But, frankly, I couldn't care very much, neither one way nor the other. Jan olieslagers (talk) 15:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above, but if any division into clasees in necessary I would favour single/multi engine.TheLongTone (talk) 15:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just remove the unused column. GraemeLeggett (talk) 16:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that's a reasonable consensus for abandoning the Class column in this particular list. Thanks all. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 15:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of triplanes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120226183741/http://www.museocaproni.it/mo_sfida_volo/sfida_Ca-53.asp to http://www.museocaproni.it/mo_sfida_volo/sfida_Ca-53.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:11, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]