Talk:Louise Nicholas

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Untitled[edit]

Is there a technical term for the principle of law that is why there was a supression order? Because I'm trying to read up on that a little more, and was hoping there would be a link to it from here. Mathmo ^Talk 00:33, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An odd addition to the article needs to be removed or elaborated on a lot more[edit]

The following that I am about to quote is put in without any context other than the source and as is is kind of insulting to a living person and either needs to be deleted or to have a lot more context added in my opinion. I am talking about the following. "Additional accusations by Nicholas

During one of the rape trials, the court heard that Nicholas had said to a school teacher that she had been raped by "Maori on horseback".[8]

I don't think the fact that she once supposedly according to a teacher made an odd comment when she was 16 years old should be included in this way. I think it needs to be rethought and either be removed or a lot more context added. House Tules (talk) 08:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)House Tules[reply]

Opening sentence[edit]

There was some degree of discussion between me and a user from an IP regarding the opening sentence. We eventually came to the current version [1] as combination of both our suggestions that were made here. Am linking to it for ease of future reference for other editors. Mathmo ^Talk 07:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another interesting source: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/1/story.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10428369 Mathmo ^Talk 03:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bias towards Nicholas[edit]

This article seems unfair. Nicholas has made various other allegations of rape, all of which have been unsubstantiated (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10372891). Most of thie article seems to be anti-police and talks about Ricards co-defendants being in jail for a rape completly unrelated to Nicholas. I understand that it may deserve a mention - but I think the procecutions case is over representated in this article. I might add a few bits and pieces into the article (with citations) but I wont make wholesale changes, I'll see what everyone else thinks first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.98.159.23 (talk) 03:03, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That was me - just created an account, yay! I also thin kthe title should change. This is all about the Louise Nicholas rape case, not her life. Can I suggest "Louise Nicholas rape allegations"? Kiwi in nz (talk) 03:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Louise Nicholas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120213000521/http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/latest/200710051659/former_police_inspector_in_nicholas_case_sent_to_prison to http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/latest/200710051659/former_police_inspector_in_nicholas_case_sent_to_prison

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:52, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]