Talk:Lucy Locket

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled][edit]

The current source (at the bottom of the page) for the factual information here says:

All Info About Nursery Rhymes was started by me, Sue, in 2001. It became amazingly successful and popular, but after a disastrous foray into a fledgling content management system, it lost Google rankings and has taken time to recover.

It’s now been completely redesigned using WordPress and is beginning to recover its position.

This is only a hobby site though, I don’t profess to be an expert, I simply do it for fun and I hope you will enjoy it in the spirit it was written.

And the section on that site on this rhyme gives the information in this article -- with no backing for the claims.



—Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.197.11.28 (talk) 23:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

…There is no prooven fact that the Tune Yankee Doodle Dandy originated in Conecticut, in fact it is More likely that it originated in New York or perhaps even on a Ship.

another formation that is aquirable is the feather upon the Hat representing  something from early English Rule and a yankee representing something of English establishing as well.

Realy do we accually know what a yankee I David George Delancey have a 42%aknowledgement configured through History that a Yankee is infact a representative of a New York reasoning just as the Patriot and both as well as the Continentals formed through The Massachusetts Malitia in accordance with the Millitary Forces of the Provincial Port Gatherings of Congress,wich was a New York Standard. A Congress exsisted for some time in New York we just seem to forget whom was Representing it and in what locations. The Continentals were to support Massachusetts with a Neutral Police Force though those words were not quite used and perhaps did exsist for some time till later on who's proccession i guess we shall conduct. Patriots were also a provision of some form of securness though in a neutral way and or manner. As well as the terming Yankees perhaps was established as a forming earlier then a patriot, in fact a patriotor patriarch was a form of duty status and represents a leadership conducted through the sons and daughters mostly the sons. The conversion of them all perhaps heavily was formal through the transportational efforts of the family wich strongly is the female addvantage of marriage or something through it , the capabilities of ,well there's numerous words one is sevivel though in servivle if one is automatically doing something of nature then servivle is a recomendation of an Art or a Economics standard and something of History, servivle is now a silent venture perhaps very rairely noticed and or protected, though is usually protected for the circumstance involved with and the agreeable opertunity wich brings a situation back such as the terming of The Yankee Doodle Dandy tune advising one perhaps to remember something else or another form of exsistance. It is a currious situation as of whom started the song though if it was researched deeply the conclution could be united as a well represented Royal Subject, and thus just meaning one with wealth and formation of cabability and or kmowledge of securness for the past present and future.David George DeLancey 4:44 P.M. E.S.T. David George DeLancey (talk) 21:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tune used in "Lucy Locket"[edit]

I'm familiar with both "Lucy Locket" and "Yankee Doodle", and while they share a similar chord structure, the version of "Lucy Locket" I know is quite different to "Yankee Doodle". Where is it that they share the same tune? Reynardo (talk) 13:07, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeh, when my mum used to sing it to me, it didn't have the same tune as Yankee Doodle Dandy. This version is to the tune of 'this is the way we wash our hair' [1] and this one has a different tune completely [2]

- [3] this one IS to the tune of Yankee Doodle Dandy, but that is NOT how I used to sing it Sweetie candykim (talk) 13:44, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]