Talk:Miami Conservancy District

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dams Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

Dam article merge[edit]

The five articles for each of the dams are a little short; I think it would be better were they merged into this article. Also, information on costruction could be merged into Dry dam. If no one objects, I'll go ahead and execute the merge this weekend. WildWeathel 01:03, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think brevity by itself should be the sole criteria by which a standalone article is judged, but in this case, I have to agree that merging the five dams into the main article is a "dam" good idea.David 15:15, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, length is not the only reson for merging articles. For the record, I think these five articles should be merged here and into "Dry dam" because they are short, have not been expanded since the original contribution, and because of overlapping descriptions of the construction of dry dams. The merging how-to states that articles should be merged "if a page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much". Since the articles haven't been expanded since August 2004, these articles should be merged. Besides, the article can always be split if it grows later. Thanks for the encouragement; this is my first edit beyond spot fixes. WildWeathel 17:26, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miami Conservancy District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130901231802/http://www.asce.org/People-and-Projects/Projects/Landmarks/Miami-Conservancy-District/ to http://www.asce.org/People-and-Projects/Projects/Landmarks/Miami-Conservancy-District/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]