Talk:Michael Sonnenreich

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Military / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Help Needed[edit]

Guys, can you help me add more information about Michael Sonnenreich? Thanks, if you have any questions about this, chat to me on my talk page Lemonpasta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemonpasta (talk • contribs) 06:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Making New Section for Michael S and Washington National Opera[edit]

CONTENT REMOVED

In my opinion NONE OF THIS is relevant to Sonnenreich, and if added to the article, should be deleted. Stay on topic. David notMD (talk) 21:31, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just need this here for a bit to help set up context on this and another article David notMD. Lemonpasta (talk) 01:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lemonpasta please use a sandbox for snippets that you want to use elsewhere.

On a different note, I've added a banner shell and commented out the Jewish-American parameters that are not currently supported. I also removed a category invocation that you had added - these categories are populated by the banners, not by direct invocation. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:22, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

None of this is in Wikipedia-appropriate style. WAY TOO subjective in tone. And abysmally unreferenced. Deletion-worthy if you try to add it to the Domingo article. David notMD (talk) 11:30, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not adding this article to Michael Sonnenreich Lemonpasta (talk) 9:29, 15 May 2018 (EST)

Explain your reasoning Lemonpasta (talk) 20:43, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And I asked Michael Sonnenreich if the information was accurate and he verified it. Lemonpasta (talk) 20:44, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this information and this. Nobody can act as a source of information about themselves. If the Pope came to Wikipedia and started editing the article about himself, he would not be allowed to add information that is not in reliable sources that are entirely independent of himself. As you are in contact with Sonnenreich, you should ideally not be editing the article directly, only suggest changes here on this talk page. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 20:47, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Check what I wrote under my user page. I don't have a conflict of interest. Once this article is near perfect enough, i'll leave and work on another article. Lemonpasta (talk) 21:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Above, you said And I asked Michael Sonnenreich if the information was accurate and he verified it. That means you have a conflict of interest, as you have personal contact with the subject, to the point where you ask his opinion of what should go into the article. Have you had time to read the information about verifiability, reliable sources, and conflict of interest that have been posted here and on your user talk page? --bonadea contributions talk 15:06, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

What is the issue?Slatersteven (talk) 15:01, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article was created by a COI editor (see discussion in the previous section). Several other people have also edited the article which means that the POV issues may have been solved, but it really needs an uninvolved editor to look at it. --bonadea contributions talk 15:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is hard to discus POV issues if we do not know what the issues actually are. What (specifically) is being objected to?Slatersteven (talk) 15:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]