This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Like most medieval works, this one has no original manuscript title, only modern titles, so there is no "right" title, just a majority consensus. The Morris edition (the influential first edition) calls it The Story of Genesis and Exodus, the Arngardt edition (the critical edition that scholars actually use) calls it The Middle English Genesis and Exodus, Birch just calls it Genesis and Exodus, and the current title of this article (Middle English Story of Genesis and Exodus) is a hybrid of these taken from some of the literature on cosmology (see this Google search). When I chose that as the title for the article my thinking was that it best represents the whole range of titles used to date. I would not resist a move if you want to make one, but don't just jump unthinkingly to 19th-century Morris. Is there evidence for current consensus in the scholarly literature on the Biblical epic? --Doric Loon (talk) 10:33, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]