Talk:Miss Zhao's suicide

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge of Draft:Miss Zhao's suicide into Miss Zhao's suicide[edit]

Please compare and consolidate. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Both articles were created by the same editor. The one in main space was created a week before your review of the draft. They seemed to have worked a bit more on the one in main space, as there is one more sub section (4.3) and also else it seems to have more info. The AfC review process was a bit unlucky for the not so experienced editor, as the first one was denied because another draft with the same title also exists and then you declined because there already exists one in mainspace. I guess they grew a bit impatient after the first decline as it was created the same day of the decline. Maybe a better coordination with the Wikipedia project of the Boston College of which the editor states they are a part of would help our AfC reviewers. Maybe an AfC category for Students drafts? I'd just leave the article and the draft as they are and wait for the draft to be archived.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There has been little participation on the discussion page since months, yet I believe this discussion is redundant as both articles are very similar and to one in main space seems better elaborated. Could we just close the discussion so readers won't be disturbed by the discussion header? Paradise Chronicle (talk) 03:10, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect added, rather than merging, given that I could see no unique referenced content. Klbrain (talk) 17:34, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done

This photo is used incorrectly[edit]

It is used as a photo at the bottom of the article as a Chinese leaders wife photos on that article confirm it's a photo of his wife with children. 2A02:C7F:32BD:1900:E51F:8085:B18D:689D (talk) 09:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]