Talk:Mission Robinson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

All the Mission articles are very short, they should be merged. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.72.36.225 (talk) 20:52, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


This article claims that Misión Robinson has raised Venezuelan literacy to a "UNESCO-Verified 99%." The article cites no sources for this statement. The reference given to the UNESCO web site takes you to a page on the UNESCO site that reads "Provided by the Permanent Delegation of Venezuela to UNESCO." There is no UNESCO report on Misión Robinson. There is no independent verification of the government's claim. The claim is not even reflected in any government statistical publication. It comes from statements made by public officials. For all we know, they may well be pure government propaganda.

Very true, the information in this article is not independently verified, and should be stated as such.

The article has now been updated with a link to the Venezuelan Education Minister's statements, which clarify that UNESCO has not certified the program.

Fair use rationale for Image:Mision robinson1.jpg[edit]

Image:Mision robinson1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mision robinson2.jpg[edit]

Image:Mision robinson2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removing unsourced claim[edit]

I removed: "The standard for a country to be considered free of illiteracy being 95%.[1]" There is a dead link, but as much as I tried I couldn't recover it. It is possible that it contained that claim, but we don't know. And if it did, than it might have also contained the claim that the illiteracy rate was down to 1 %. (Cf. [2]) I didn't find any place where UNESCO gives this or the other often cited number of 96 %. Both numbers only appear in articles speaking about countries or other territorial entities who used the Cuban Yes, I Can method and declared themselves "free of illiteracy". 123 (talk) 21:48, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mission Robinson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:46, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]