Talk:Mitsubishi F-1

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mitsubishi F-1 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Aviation / Asian / Japanese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Japan: Military history Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 11:42, June 5, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

When?[edit]

When was the craft developed? --Compay 20:18, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 10:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The SEPECAT Jaguar and the F-1[edit]

"00:39, 4 December 2008 BillCJ (Talk | contribs) (6,751 bytes) (Removed incorrect item - Jaguar development began around same time as the T-2, on which F-1 is completely based; Jaguar not supersonic)"

http://www.faqs.org/docs/air/avt2f1.html

The T-2 was first proposed in 1967 after negotiations for a licensed production of the, as of yet, unbuilt SEPECAT Jaguar design (established in 1966) in Japan fell through. The single seat Jaguar proposed for the Japanese 'T-X' competition was an 'inspiration' for the indigenous Japanese designed trainer but remained a Japanese design. The F-1 is NOT a copy of the SEPECAT Jaguar, one has to simply compare the specifications and dimensions to see that the aircraft is different. The inclusion of the SEPECAT Jaguar as a 'related aircraft' is not in terms of performance or role but of design. Semi-Lobster (talk) 01:30, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The field is for "similar/comparable aircraft". By your own standard in removing the SOKO J-22 (also similar in design, and "inspired" by the Jaguar), the subsonic Jaguar, being, is not comparable. "Looking alike" is generally not enough for inclusion in that field, though it would be fine under the "See also" field. Hope that helps. - BillCJ (talk) 01:53, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhh... I thought you were disputing the 'connection' between the Jaguar and F-1, sorry about that. But I'm not sure if it could fit under 'Related development' either since that is usually reserved for aircraft developed to or from and the T-2, although borrowing concepts from the Jaguar design, was still a local design not 'directly' related to the Jaguar. Semi-Lobster (talk) 02:24, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not "Related development", as I agree they are not directly related. I was referring to the "See also" field, which is the bottom of the template. Sorry I was not more specific, as these fields can be a bit confusing at times. - BillCJ (talk) 02:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well both are subheaders under 'See Also' so I assumed they had to go into one of them. But if it can just go under 'See Also' without going under either of them without violating some sort of 'wikietiquette'. Thanks for the help! Semi-Lobster (talk) 03:07, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bill CJ[edit]

you reversed my changes to the F-1 page but is there any reasons for doing so? I believe at least most of my information was correct and that there was no reason to reverse these changes. The information you changed it back to are wrong and old. E.g. the F-1 was retired in 2006.

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mitsubishi F-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060513022552/http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXHAC7&P=7 to http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXHAC7&P=7

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The F-111 and its relevancy.[edit]

Rather than starting an edit war, I’ll instead voice my opinion here. Both the F-111 and the F-1 are (generally) attack/strike aircraft, both are of similar appearance and are often confused with one another, and both feature similar capabilities (except payload). As a result, I feel it falls under the “comparable role” and “era” category. Heyimastopsign (talk) 04:17, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]