Talk:Ohel Leah Synagogue

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Very annoyed...today I went to take couples of pics of this Jewish churich. Then a Nepalese guard approached me and said, "no photos! This is a private building." Promptly he requested me to deleted the photos. :-/ -- Jerry Crimson Mann 05:58, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm.. some religious venues are like that. Better tell them frankly the purpose of the pictures. :-) — Instantnood 10:36, July 23, 2005 (UTC)

the romanization of the chinese name[edit]

its in Mandarin, not Cantonese as it should be!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 169.229.53.83 (talk) 02:27, 16 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ohel Leah Synagogue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]