Talk:Olney, Buckinghamshire

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

the L in Olney[edit]

(Copied from User talk:Richard New Forest)

Why do you think that the L in Olney is not enunciated? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:53, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Careful instruction throughout my childhood... Not being local to there myself, I had understood that everyone said it that way, but see [1], which makes it clear that the L is now often pronounced. My family were originally from there, but several generations ago, so they obviously use the old pronunciation. As it seems it is said both ways, both versions ought to be given. I've changed the page. --Richard New Forest (talk) 14:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Those that do not pronounce the L are adamant that this is the correct pronunciation, on the other hand, those that pronounce the L think that without the L is sounds silly. I think it sounds silly either way and adjust my pronunciation depending on who I am talking to :) -- Borb (talk) 17:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gay pancake race[edit]

See WP:notable. Not every local giggle deserves listing. Try again when it has run 5 years in a row, attracts at least 100 people and is reported in a credible national newspaper. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Name of this article[edit]

Olney is in Milton Keynes (borough) which legally is a separate county. It is no longer in administrative county described in the Buckinghamshire article though, as stated in the article, it is the ceremonial county. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:15, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Borough of Milton Keynes is not a county. It is a unitary authority which looks after the day to day running of the town. Olney is still in Buckinghamshire (ceremonially) and so I feel it would be better to call it Olney, Buckinghamshire. Mpvide65 (talk) 19:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the Act that established the Borough as a Unitary Authority. It states quite clearly that in law it is a county. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:07, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, Olney, Milton Keynes is confusing as it leads readers to assume that Olney is part of Milton Keynes the town, like Bletchley. Olney, as I have said above, is still in Buckinghamshire, and so should have Bucks in it's title. There is enough info on the actual page to tell them that it is governed by Milton Keynes (borough). Mpvide65 (talk) 19:56, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your change leads them to infer completely incorrectly that it is in Buckinghamshire, which is not the case and plain wrong. Readers only have to read the first few sentences to see that it is some distance from Milton Keynes. (In my view, the Bletchley article ought to be Bletchley (Milton Keynes) but that is a different debate). --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:07, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to think that a unitary authority is it's own county. This is wrong, as all unitary authorities have a ceremonial county e.g Swindon=Wiltshire, Slough=Berkshire, Medway=Kent etc. So Olney is in ceremonial Buckinghamshire, which means it can have Bucks in its title. Mpvide65 (talk) 20:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In law, each UA is a county. The ceremonial county is just that - ceremonial. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:31, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has transferred to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#Olney, Milton Keynes; Caversham, Reading; Wanborough, Swindon.

(Written before above transfer):

A unitary authority does cover all the formal political and administrative activities of a county. However, a town does not exist solely in a political and administrative world. It also has a history, a social position, an economy, a geographical location and many other aspects. The very recent chopping up of traditional counties does not change all of those. "Milton Keynes" makes Olney sound like a suburb of a town which did not exist for almost all of Olney's history. To me, Olney is "really" in Buckinghamshire, in the same way that Southampton and Portsmouth are in Hampshire, Bournemouth in Dorset, Kingston in Surrey and Bromley, Dartford and Chatham in Kent – to pretend otherwise is to deny hundreds of years of history, and geographical and sociological reality. Olney may currently happen to be administered from Milton Keynes, but for many important purposes it is in Buckinghamshire. As importantly, I suspect that many of those unfamiliar with Milton Keynes are pretty vague about where that is (I didn't know, and I've been there...), but they will be much more aware of where the traditional county of Buckinghamshire is. Richard New Forest (talk) 20:50, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#Olney, Milton Keynes; Caversham, Reading; Wanborough, Swindon. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 21:01, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion has been settled. Result: use ceremonial counties for disambiguation of places, and in a geographic frame of reference, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#Olney, Milton Keynes; Caversham, Reading; Wanborough, Swindon. Mpvide65 (talk) 22:11, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Two of the examples in JMF's last comment are wrong: Kingston upon Thames and Bromley are actually both in London. Jim Michael (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Olney, Buckinghamshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090608003948/http://www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/parishes/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=17026 to http://www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/parishes/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=17026

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]