Talk:PZL P.11

Military history: Aviation / Technology / Weaponry / European / Polish / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	Polish military history task force
	World War II task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Poland C‑class Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Propeller#Propeller theory|fixed-pitch propeller]] The anchor (#Propeller theory) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled[edit]

User:Jinxs added the aero-table, hope that's ok w/ u.

Sure. Any idea when is the temporary aero table replaced with a proper infobox? //Halibu tt 13:42, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Best airplane in the world briefly, eh? Sources?

You Tube[edit]

Short clip at:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTHFeNBqyJ4

81.86.144.210 21:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Difficult to say, and the engine cover didn't look right. Still maybe in slow montion and zoom 100% can be obtained. --Jinxs 22:35, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PZL 11 c[edit]

I've heared that every third PZL 11c was fitted with two 20mm cannons which were synchronised at several hundred meters as they were meant to be used in a stand-off attack on enemy bombers (to out-range the manually operated defensive machineguns of the bombers). Is this true?

Veljko Stevanovich 5. 8. 2007. 8:45 UTC+1

No, it's certainly not true. Piotr Mikołajski 19:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From Il-2 game I heard that it has machineguns with intentionaly low accuracy/unmatched barrel axises to provide a "shotgun" effect.--Oleg Str (talk) 08:47, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Highly implausible. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 11:43, 18 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Comparsions[edit]

Trying to make the comparison to the Junkers Ju-87, an attack aircraft to the PZL. P.11 is illogical. You are comparing two dissimilar types. If you want to make valid comparison, be ready to provide authoritative and valid reference sources. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

B-class review[edit]

This article is currently at start/C class, but could be improved to B-class if it had more (inline) citations.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 03:42, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]