Talk:Peppermill Reno

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles

Gambling Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Fair use rationale for Image:Peppermilllogo.jpg[edit]

Image:Peppermilllogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality of article[edit]

A while back, it appears that this article was completely reweritten to add content. While it is very detailed, it also runs borderline to being an advertisement for the casino. This occured at the same time a similar event occured to the article for the Atlantis Hotel Casino (another large property in South Reno, just down the street from the Peppermill), though with the Atlantis, it appeared to me more of a blatent advertising campaign than a legitimate update to the article. I shall do what I can to remedy the situation on this article as I did with the Atlantis article. N Yo FACE 22:21, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How to?[edit]

I would like to rewrite this article. I'm going to visit the hotel soon.

Is there any other hotel type article that i could base it off of? - Mile92 (talk) 04:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Casino or Resort[edit]

Is this article supposed to be about the resort or just the casino. To me the former is more notable, does anyone object to renaming it? --Nuujinn (talk) 22:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peppermill was fined the largest fine ever levied by the Nevada Gaming Commission, why isn't that in this article?[edit]

http://www.rgj.com/story/money/gaming/2014/02/14/peppermill-faces-1m-fine-for-slot-machine-spying/5484131/

75.0.4.134 (talk) 22:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]