Talk:Perak/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
HELP!!
Uploaded a map of the administrative divisions of Perak.
I'm not from Perak and don't know much about it. The article says that Perak has 10 daerah (districts) which include Larut-Matang and Selama. However, from the state government website shows that Larut, Matang and Selama as one daerah. So which should be it? This is because the Malaysian state government are known to be rather slow in updating their websites sometime.
--Bukhrin 02:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi!! Perak only have 9 district..though it have too many Municipal Council in one district but it still have 9..and not 10.. and the pic of Division of Perak, you should swap back the Kerian district to Larut, Matang dan Selama and so the other hand...the pic has wrongly stated..Kerian is the one on the left..Thanks for contribute!!
--Hafrul
- Wow, seriously ? So the image in the state government website is wrong. LOL. So much for e-government. Will change back when I get the chance to unpack all of my stuffs back. --Bukhrin 07:49, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Population Figures
The population figures seemed to be out of date. Anyone can clarify?
Zhernfai 21:57, 21 Apr 2006 (GMT +8)
- Why is there numbering in this article?! Manderiko 07:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Literature
The current literature part is redundant as far as I can see, without offering any explanation to putting them there at all. Anyone against the removal of the literature section?Mhching (talk) 02:07, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Constitutional crisis
Hey, I've moved the section on the crisis to a page of its own because it was beginning to affect the focus of the article. Main page like that is always supposed to be general. Any specific especially if it is written in depth deserves its own page. Regards, __earth (Talk) 01:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned references in Perak
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Perak's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "census 2010":
- From Ipoh: "Population Distribution by Local Authority Areas and Mukims, 2010" (PDF). Department of Statistics Malaysia.
- From Penang: http://www.statistics.gov.my/portal/download_Population/files/population/04Jadual_PBT_negeri/PBT_Perak.pdf.
{{cite web}}: Missing or empty|title=(help)
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:21, 28 July 2018 (UTC)