Talk:Phi Sigma Nu

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fraternities and Sororities C‑class Mid‑importance

	Phi Sigma Nu is part of the Fraternities and Sororities WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Greek Life on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to International social societies, local organizations, honor societies, and their members. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project page, where you can join the project, and/or contribute to the discussion.Fraternities and SororitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Fraternities and SororitiesTemplate:WikiProject Fraternities and SororitiesFraternities and Sororities articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyvio revdeletion[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Can an admin perform a copyvio revdeletion of this article? Ryan Vesey 05:29, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan, can you point out the source?--SPhilbrick (Talk) 12:47, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- http://phisigmanu.com/about/ --GrapedApe (talk) 13:39, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The present article is not a copyright violation; if the text from their website is present in the history, I do not think that is a serious enough violation to require rev-deletion unless the copyright holder complains, which seems unlikely. JohnCD (talk) 19:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reinstated Admin help. It is common practice to revdelete copyrighted material and we do not wait for the copyright holder to complain. Ryan Vesey 04:56, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From WP:Copyright problems: "If infringement is not blatant... The infringing text will remain in the page history for archival reasons unless the copyright holder asks the Wikimedia Foundation to remove it (unless it is tagged for {{copyvio-revdel}}." My reading of that is that in a case like this, where the organization is copying its own website to promote itself and so is unlikely to object, we don't bother unless asked. Rev-del is a tool we are told to use only when necessary, and the whole thing is likely to be deleted as non-notable anyway. But I will leave the admin-help to see if another admin agrees with you. JohnCD (talk) 10:05, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've hidden the revisions since I can see no editorial reason to keep blatant copyright violations in our page history. Reaper Eternal (talk) 11:53, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]