Talk:RS-28 Sarmat/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
yields other info
speculative things in talk or also is ok all right in article ?! --Zafer14ur8 (talk) 19:36, 29 August 2015 (UTC) s & r
Compares poorly to other wikipedias
The Russian-language Wikipedia entry is much more extensive and much more enlightening, even when simply translated using Google Translate.Pandapod1 (talk) 07:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC) The russian article is a lof of speculations, and not really hard fact, and alot of things that Isnt relative or even realistic.
- useful to the current WP article:
RS-28 Sarmat missile (SS-X-30 Satan 2 according to the NATO nomenclature) capable of carrying between the 10 and the 24 tested and, apparently, equipped with "system of fractional orbital bombardment
— [1]
this statement needs to be verified by additional sources.
Satan 2
Would be good to have info on where this name "Satan 2" comes from. 129.78.56.143 (talk) 23:02, 26 October 2016 (UTC) Its just the medias namn on it. NATO´s ASIC that put designation on stuff havn´t put any name on this missile due its not in service fully. And NATO don´t do own codenames anymore due they use the official russian names, due russian put names on them nowdays. Even if RT-2PM2 Topol-M have a NATO name "Sickle B", they almost only use "Topol-M". Pandapod1 (talk) 07:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- No kidding, you'd think they'd hide their bias a little better.Historian932 (talk) 00:13, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
(Undent) As a general principle, for topics well covered in the news media, WP usually follows the naming conventions used by the mainstream media. In other words, if the mainstream media commonly uses a particular name, then that name should normally be listed as a known name for the topic (even if it is unofficial). "Satan 2" are well represented in the media coverage:
"Snowflake" is also used, though not as much.
Can somebody state a reason for the controversy on the edits? All I'm hearing is personal bias, which is not really part of the WP standards.
-- MC 141.131.2.3 (talk) 16:01, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- As far as stated from the Russian version of this article, the name SATAN 2 is not used at all in Russia. It is a name only used in Western media and Western politicians. 87.178.174.37 (talk) 08:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- At least it should be clearly marked that this name is a Western media word. Otherwise someone might believe that this name is somehow official or is used throughout the world, which is not the case. 87.178.174.37 (talk) 08:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- @141.131.2.3 When you speak of mainstream media you are insinuating media of Western countries comprise approx a mere 17% of the world's population. To conclude. The facts provided offer a finer example of personal bias. GQGeorge (talk) 04:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Facebook has labelled apost containing information from this page " partly false". 112.134.174.239 (talk) 16:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)