This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved as uncontroversial by RHaworth. (Since nobody objected to the move, I tagged the target for G6 deletion and the page has since been moved. Closing after the fact.) (non-admin closure) Paul_012 (talk) 03:06, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
By the Electrecity Generating Authority of Thailand, who operates the dam,[1] as well as several book sources as shown in Google Books.[2] --Paul_012 (talk) 03:54, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is a contested technical request (permalink). -- AlexTW 04:19, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
AlexTheWhovian, would you care to elaborate on why you contested the request? --Paul_012 (talk) 04:52, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The redirect to an appropriate section was reverted, so a requested move was required. I have no opinion on the article. -- AlexTW 05:41, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure I follow. If you're not disputing the spelling, the move itself should be uncontroversial. Whether to have this as a separate article or to merge/redirect should be a separate discussion. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:57, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
