Talk:Saarbrücken

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

English pronunciation[edit]

Could someone put in an english "translation" of the pronounciation? Other artiles have this (an approximate translation)? 82.32.203.68 18:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done, although the pronunciation contains at least two sounds ("r" and "ü") that do not exist in English and a hard to approximate.192.150.186.138 (talk) 01:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The IPA pronunciation, which is unambiguous, is already given, so I'm taking out the "English approximation", which in any case is not normally given despite the comment above. Lfh (talk) 14:54, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History section issue[edit]

The "history" section does not discuss the history of "Saarbrücken" at all, but rather that of the Saar region (s. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saarland).99.161.111.142 (talk) 23:18, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relying heavily on the Saarbrücken's chronicle from the city's homepage, some research done on the internet, as well as some books I own, and some other wikipedia articles, I have rewritten the history section up to the 20th century. Maybe I will also add some information to the 20th century section – some of those books I own are focussing on that era – but I think the history section now discusses the city's history, not the region's. --Micge (talk) 05:49, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I added the world wars based on material from the Allies, available online. Those books giving the German point of view will follow later. --Micge (talk) 17:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for your important contributions, including the war history. --Pp.paul.4 (talk) 21:34, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Historic Pictures from WWII Saarbrücken[edit]

I found some interesting pictures on [1], I want to find out about their copyrights to figure whether they can be put on Wikipedia:

  • [2] (best one), (the webmaster said: "Corbis image, a comped copy that can be downloaded for free. A higher res photo can be purchased") I also found the picture at corbis site [3], but I found it as well in a list of pictures allegedly taken by members of the 101st Cavalry [4]
  • [5] (the webmaster said: "war department photo and hence in the public domain. Credit: Boyer, Office of War Information.")
  • [6] (the webmaster said: "Signal Corps photo and hence in the public domain")
  • [7].(the webmaster said: "US National Archives and hence in the public domain. Credit must be given to National Archives when posting")

Does anyone know if Copyright status of work by the U.S. government does apply here, analogously to [8]? -- Micge (talk) 23:36, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Collection of possible sources[edit]

A list of sources that might help improve the article. -- Micge (talk) 01:02, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

--Micge (talk) 13:32, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Report to Saarbrücken:[edit]

  • Elevation not showing
  • Bugs
  • Needs cleansing

Reported! 46.130.130.255 (talk) 15:30, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 (5 have since been resolved -- Micge (talk) 14:46, 30 August 2018 (UTC)) external links on Saarbrücken. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:[reply]

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]