This article is within the scope of WikiProject American football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of American football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.American footballWikipedia:WikiProject American footballTemplate:WikiProject American footballAmerican football articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
I tried to add "(as the California Redwoods)" to the 2009 heading, since the article is now at the Sacramento location and not the California location, but I was reverted, with the only comment being "implied". Now, I'm not goint to get into an edit war over this, but it's only implied if the reader were to read the history of the franchise, and not just skimmed the article. Woogee (talk) 22:48, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think we can do better than that, and I won't get into the WP:MOS issues with having a long heading with parentheses. Having a separate section for each's year's schedule is barely a long-term solution in the first place. Pats1T/C 22:51, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What's your alternative, other than a separate page for each season? Woogee (talk) 22:52, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just design the articles a bit differently. It's all a work in progress... Pats1T/C 23:03, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]