This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. Despite the discussion being open for 5 weeks, no consensus has formed as to whether or not the page should be moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jack Frost (talk) 03:29, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Is the rest of it really a subtitle? A quick search for this book suggests that sources always give the title in full. Lennart97 (talk) 22:49, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Arabic spelling is شقائق الأترنج في رقائق الغنج . What does it mean? Google Translate says "Citronchips in coquette chips", which does not make sense to me. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:19, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It makes sense to me as a euphemism for something inside something else... I think you can guess what things in particular. Andrewa (talk) 03:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.