Talk:Spodnje Gorje

Slovenia Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

Requests: Jože Tisnikar (sl), Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl)
Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations
Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle
Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
Expand: Education in Slovenia
Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Omar Naber, Radenska
NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band)
Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture
Help assess the quality of 65 unassessed articles
Take/Add requested photographs

Relative pronoun[edit]

This edit appears to be based on the principle of WP:JDL. A more substantive reason should be offered for the change. (A source for reference: "We use that instead of who, whom or which in relative clauses to refer to people, animals and things. We use it to introduce defining clauses only ..."; Cambridge Dictionary, Relative Pronouns). Doremo (talk) 12:34, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- Amazing that an editor of a reference resource would resist replacing the pronoun "that" with the preferable "who", when referring to people. (For example, see https://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2012/06/who-versus-that.html and https://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2012/09/07/that-who-which/.) There's no valid reason to revert the appropriate replacement of the pronoun "that" with the preferred pronoun "who".Froid (talk) 12:45, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]