Talk:State Route 346 (New York–Vermont)

State Route 346 (New York–Vermont) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 20, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

New York (state): Capital District

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Capital District (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Roads: State highways / New York / Vermont Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	New York Vermont
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Change of Intersection Template[edit]

This article was changed to bring its intersection template to the NYint format. No other changes were made. It is important to verify, update and/or correct as necessary. Fwgoebel 21:54, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:State Route 346 (New York–Vermont)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):

WP:LEAD introduces new information - The name of US-7 (Ethan Allen Highway). Also, please add (Route 346) after "New York State Route 346 and Vermont Route 346". Also, you added Vermont after the VT city/county, but not NY after Town of Petersburgh in Rensselaer County; be consistent.
Both paragraphs of your RD start the same way, can you mix it up? Do we know who owns the railroad tracks that VT 346 crosses? In the RD you use a mix of Route and NY xx, please pick one and be consistent.
In the history, "By the time 1965 came around" doesn't sound very encyclopedic

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
You use a traffic report as a ref, but can you add the actual AADT info into the article, for both NY and VT?
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
getting a picture would be nice as well, but not a requirement.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
On hold awaiting improvements. --Admrboltz (talk) 17:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That has traffic data counts not report - Mitch32^(UP) 17:51, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: The report site went down, so that is unaccessible right now.Mitch32^(UP) 17:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes have been made. Passing --Admrboltz (talk) 18:04, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]