Talk:Stefan Schuster

Sources

The first source Game theory, written by the subject of article i.e. Primary source. Second, Metabolic, written by subject of article, primary source. Third, Biological oscillations written by subject of article, primary source. Fourth Pathways written by subject of article, primary source. Metabolic network, written by subject of article, primary source, all of these references are primary sources in this section. Research section primary source. Sugar turns to fat, non MEDRs for medical source.

There is not a single reliable secondary source showing this individual is notable, nor that he actually has done these things that are said he is done, because we cannot go off of primary sources. --VViking_TalkEdits 18:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

We can be sure "that he actually has done these things that are said he is done" because the References are scientific papers in international journals, some of them high-ranking such as Nature and Nature Biotechnology. These papers were peer-reviewed, that is, assessed by independent experts! Moreover, the entry involved three secondary sources: a book review by Athel Cornish-Bowden, a press release by the (highly official) Informationsdienst Wissenschaft (Scientific information service in Germany) and a German journal for physicians. In summary, I kindly ask the Wikipedia admins to undo the deletions. Ricercatore (talk) 07:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

These are all highly scrutinised journals by experts in their field, and he is not the sole author - there is no way these could be made up, writing such papers is not easy - I've done a couple and that was enough. Let's restore it for now, and take it to WT:MED if you like for a wider consensus. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 01:56, 16 March 2019 (UTC)