Talk:Tabula clesiana

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

the contribution of experts in Roman law would be appreciated considering the specific reference of the Tabula to the innovations in the same Roman law during the imperial period Cunibertus (talk) 10:12, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

complaiant - a typo?[edit]

complaiant seems to be a typo but it is not obvious what it should be - can anyone figure out what it should be? (from Wikipedia:Correct typos in one click)

The provided source does not reveal the passage cited so no help there. However, I note the Italian article is much more detailed. Perhaps somebody fluent in Italian can help? CapnZapp (talk) 21:37, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bellowhead678, did you just forget you opened up a discussion on this? Cheers CapnZapp (talk) 22:15, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I forgot to say, I had a quick look at the Italian page and using Google Translate, complaint seems to be the most reasonable word, but happy t0 be corrected by someone who can actually speak Italian! Bellowhead678 (talk) 08:07, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Connection to Val Bregaglia[edit]

Please see Talk:Val Bregaglia CapnZapp (talk) 09:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]