This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved by Phantomsteve. --BDD (talk) 18:05, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Takri → Takri (Unicode block) – A reader who searches for "Takri" is much more likely to be searching for Takri alphabet instead of the Unicode block encompassing said alphabet, so Takri should redirect to that page. Apparently "Unicode block" is a common disambiguator for this kind of articles. Jafeluv (talk) 09:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, (Unicode block) was the standard disambiguation if there was a preexisting content page or redirect at the block name. Obviously, some of them, like Greek Extended weren't ever going to need disambiguation. Since this was always the intended scheme, and Takri alphabet is a good target for this term, I don't think anyone would object to this. VanIsaacWSVexcontribs 10:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.