Talk:Texas EquuSearch

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Source?[edit]

"TES has gained a reputation as a well-equipped organization which can deploy on short notice resources such as radar, sonar, scuba diving or SAR dog teams, and vehicles ranging from all-terrain vehicles to boats to aircraft to remotely operated vehicles."

Is there a source to support this claim? Perhaps it is indeed true, but (to me) it sounds suspiciously like the opinion of the editor who inserted the statement... -Grammaticus Repairo (talk) 15:05, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to edit it accordingly. That line always didn't sit well with me, but being located where they are based, I see them in action quite a bit, so it is hard for me to be impartial. --Hourick (talk) 22:51, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Original editor here who wrote this line. I have no affiliation with the organization but am a member of the EMS community in Houston. The information comes from conversations with people from around here who have worked with TES (which I personally have not). I agree that it sounds opinionated. Feel free to edit, and thanks (to both of you) for improving the page. -BigDukeSix (talk) 21:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Timeframes?[edit]

Two later entries in the list of notable searches use the phrase "Search currently underway" without providing a time frame. Shouldn't that include an entry date or some other indication of the time frame?50.175.88.50 (talk) 21:44, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]