This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Boat Race 2000 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
A fact from The Boat Race 2000 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 June 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Oxford's victory in The 2000 Boat Race was a "shock triumph"?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rowing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rowing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RowingWikipedia:WikiProject RowingTemplate:WikiProject Rowingrowing articles
This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge Wikiproject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
"based on the opinion that getting a lead early in the race would give them an advantage" no reference for this opinion.
At the end of the paragraph. Repeated directly after sentence. Matty.007
"Cambridge pressed and rewon their lead, and were a quarter of a length ahead after a favourable bend. Though level at Chiswick Steps, Oxford pushed ahead, gaining a five second lead by Barnes Bridge, and eight at the finish." no reference.
"Oxford were considered the underdogs, and their victory came as a "shock triumph".[9]" this is in the crew section, you've given the game away before the race description section!
Nearly there, just one query, please make sure your "works" and "publishers" are consistently and correctly formatted. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:06, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Attempted fix. Thanks, Matty.007 17:34, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Any reason why "The Independent Rowing News" is a publisher while "BBC Sport" is a work? What's your logic? The Rambling Man (talk) 18:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
ProveIt GT only has the publisher slot for magazines, but I have now changed it. Thanks, Matty.007 18:18, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Why is one person cited inline? "Glassman 22[1]"? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Referencing the table. Unless it should go elsewhere? Thanks, Matty.007 18:37, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I usually introduce the table with some prose, or worst case add a "Source:[1]" style attribution below the table. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Moved. In a better place now, or should it be somewhere else? Thanks, Matty.007 18:42, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me. One last check over before I promote. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:46, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]