This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
The Medieval Review is part of WikiProject Open Access, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to Open Access and at improving other articles with the help of materials from Open Access sources. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Open AccessWikipedia:WikiProject Open/Open access task forceTemplate:WikiProject Open AccessOpen access articles
I am not hot on this topic, I started the page for only one reason: I wished Wikipedia could have told me what it was. If I search for something and I have to multiple searches, I build a Wikipage, so other people can get that info. So I think the page is needed, and it appears in books here, here and here among other places. So I say keep the page, it is notable. History2007 (talk) 14:28, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree it deserves a page--it looks like a useful and open access reference that others can use to improve other wikipeida articles. Jaldous1 (talk) 00:05, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]