This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thelma (2017 film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
I first edited the article on 23 June 2018, after watching the film, and intend to build up and improve it as much as possible. I think it would be beneficial if editors located in Northern Europe were to search for material about Thelma and add valuable ones as sources -- if not as citations, then useful as *Further reading*. Cheers! Pyxis Solitary 09:48, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Template:Talk header was deleted (1) by editor PC78 on 27 December 2018 with "don't need" as the explanation. I re-added the template (2) on 28 December and linked the template with "useful" and "no reason why it can't be used" as the summary. User PC78 deleted it again (3) on 28 December and quoted "template should be used only when needed" from a page notice as the reason. I reverted the deletion (4) on 29 December with summary that the explication of "'Needed' is not defined in the template guideline" and, therefore, the rationale is "a matter of opinion". In my experience as a Wikipedia contributor, I have found the header to be a useful guide that provides awareness of policies and personal conduct. PC78 has a different point of view. The template documentation does not provide the criteria for "Needed". Also, the actual wording of the usage guideline is: "This template should be placed only where it's needed." Aside from the only specific No's being (a) singular edit and (b) new articles, it leaves adding the header to the discretion of individual editors. According to the documentation, the Talk header template "is used on 420,000+ pages". Can we have a neutral consensus regarding keeping/not keeping the Talk header for this article? Pyxis Solitaryyak 04:42, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The template documentation clearly states: "There is no need to add this template to every talk page." What purpose does it serve on a talk page with little or no activity? It just adds unnecessary template clutter IMHO, and if you place it everywhere then I think it's more likley that people will ignore it. I'm not sure this really needs discussion here on the film's talk page, you could have just left a message on my talk page if you felt so strongly about it. I'm happy for us to disagree and will leave it in place here. :) PC78 (talk) 11:37, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pyxis Solitary yak 13:32, 21 February 2019 (UTC)