Talk:Traianus (magister peditum)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group.

Military history: Roman & Byzantine

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Goths rebelled and had sacked Adrianople?[edit]

This claim is marked as 'citation needed'. I think it is false. I've checked several references (e.g. Heather, 'The Fall of the Roman Empire'; Wolfram, 'History of the Goths') and they make no mention of the rebelling Goths sacking Adrianople. Wolfram says (p120) a Roman unit comprised of Goths rebelled when ordered to move to Asia Minor. The unit (along with Fritigern) besieged Adrianople but unsuccessfully. RMcPhillip (talk) 17:53, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is definitely incorrect. A Gothic unit stationed in the city was forced out, and they joined up with the Goths who were marching towards Adrianople. They tried to take the city after the battle, but failed. Oatley2112 (talk) 22:52, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ad Salices discussion[edit]

I found the text following 'The two generals decided to' confusing.

In Ammianus Marcellinus, XXXI VII,3 does not say that the Romans 'succeeded in pushing the Goths inside the valleys'. It says '...having driven back the enemy beyond the abrupt precipices of the Balkan, they [the Romans] seized upon the rugged defiles in order to hem in the barbarians on ground...'. Based on Wolfram 'History of the Goths' chapter 3, I read this that the Romans drove the Goths north of the Haemus mountains and seized the mountain passes, hemming the Goths into the Danube river valley of Lower Moesia.

In Ammianus Marcellinus, XXXI VII,5 it says that of the three generals Profuturus, Traianus and Richomeres, they all agreed that Richomeres would be the chief commander. The text should say so rather than 'to unite to the units of Richomeres', which doesn't mean anything.

What evidence is there that 'Ad Salices' was near Marcianopolis? Peter Heather in 'The Fall of the Roman Empire' Chapter 4, 'The Battle of Hadrianople' indicates 'Ad Salices' lay in Dobruja.

RMcPhillip (talk) 01:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]