Talk:USS Concord (PG-3)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleUSS Concord (PG-3) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starUSS Concord (PG-3) is part of the Yorktown class gunboats series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 28, 2009Good article nomineeListed
May 19, 2009Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Quarantine Station Era[edit]

The Concord was assigned to the Public Health Service of the Department of the Treasury, NOT the US Coast Guard. The vessel served as a hulk for the detention of passengers and crew for the purposes of quarantine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.162.30 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think this has been addressed. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:43, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Concord (PG-3)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Below is my review of the article:

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    1. Lead: I would personally keep the lead maximum of 3 paragraphs.
    2. Discrepancy in date of laying down: Lead and text say it to be March 1888; the infobox says it is May 1888.
    3. Discrepancy in date of launch: lead says, March 1890; the main text says March 1889.
    • The May 1888 and March 1890 dates were the correct ones; I've corrected the article. — Bellhalla (talk) 10:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Rest everything looks fine. There were a few 'on's missing before the dates. I inserted them. Thanks - DSachan (talk) 09:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review. — Bellhalla (talk) 10:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:USS_Concord_(PG-3)&oldid=1212767779"