Talk:Ultraviolet photography

Can't find published sources[edit]

I have searched and searched for published references to use as inline citations but have been unable to find anything. Will keep trying. 10.24.2013 by AGB: professional uv photographer.

I'm fixing the links for long, medium, and short wave.[edit]

This article is linking to the radio waves. The terms are inappropritae for this UV article. -Arch dude 22:35, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures[edit]

This article calls for pictures but all I find in Commons is black light pictures and ultraviolet astronomy that I understand are not the subject of this article. --84.20.17.84 08:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

commerical endoresement[edit]

there seems to be an External Link (http://www.macrolenses.de/objektive_sl.php?lang) that's really a commercial endorsement. does anyone wlse think this should be removed? 220.76.15.52 (talk) 16:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fluorite, not Fluoride![edit]

The mineral the UV-Lenses are made of is chemically calcium fluoride,

as a mineral called fluorite by geologists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.221.220.217 (talk) 20:18, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uses[edit]

Please expand and elaborate on the uses - how exactly is it used in astronomy, medicine, criminology, dermatology, theatre, etc... Also, does it have a practical use for professional photographers (outside of modern art exhibitions whose sole goal is to show stuff in fancy colours) - e.g. the portrait of the man that is in the article - how does that differ from a visible light photo and why might a photographer decide to make UV photos? Thanks! BigSteve (talk) 11:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]