This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2017. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Someone in Italy must have read the book? The only review appears to be by someone paid to write something at the end of the book. Its not the New York Times fault that they decided to feature other books. If it is a conspiracy then please quote the 3rd party people who agree. Victuallers (talk) 22:18, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Victuallers: What conspiracy? I can't make sense of your comment or your edits. Edvige Giunta is female, for one thing, and she is not the only reviewer. Did you look at the Bibliography and Further Reading sections, which list a number of in-depth articles about the book? And even if Giunta were the only reviewer, why would that invalidate her opinion? Giunta is a literary scholar who has taken an interest in what she considers a neglected work. You seem to be impugning her integrity. If you disagree with her view of the American literary establishment circa 1979 and its treatment of Italian-American women writers, you go right ahead and write a paper about that and have it published in a peer-reviewed literary journal, and I'll quote you in this article. Until then, I'm not interested in your personal views on the subject. --MopTop (talk) 00:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you are "not interested" then I won't offer a reply. I am willing to AGF when you are open to listen Victuallers (talk) 10:49, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}