Talk:Vaccine Revolt

Brazil: History Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the History of Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jackh18. Peer reviewers: Jgriffith19, RyanF20.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creating article[edit]

This is based on a translation of Revolta da Vacina http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolta_da_Vacina in the Portuguese Wikipedia. -- Writtenonsand 17:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need to tweak categories[edit]

Can somebody please tweak the categories as necessary? I don't understand the details of this. Thanks. -- Writtenonsand 17:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I added two categories. Carioca 17:20, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Obrigado -- Writtenonsand 11:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Editions[edit]

The most urgent problem with this article that must be addressed is its complete lack of in-text citations. In order to properly archive the vaccine revolt as a historical event providing valuable insight into the planning of contemporary Rio de Janeiro, it is essential to verify the claims made in this article to the extent possible. The body of the article itself is fairly comprehensive - the priority, therefore, will be to locate citations for every piece of information provided by the original author(s) while adding additional knowledge gleaned from the literature utilized in this process. These are encompassed within the following list:

Carmo, Joao Paulo Martins do (8 February 2018). “Yellow Fever Vaccine in Brazil: A Revolt Backwards 100 Years Later?”. Crimson Publishers. Aurora, CO.

Domingues, Carla Magda Allan S., Antonia Maria da Silva Teixeira and Sandra Maria Deotti Carvalho (October 2012). “National Immunization Program: Vaccination, Compliance, and Pharmacovigilance”. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo. 54: S22-S27.

Hochman, Gilberto (April 2009). “Priority, Invisibility, and Eradication: The History of Smallpox and the Brazilian Public Health Agenda”. Medical History. 53: 229-252.

Meade, Teresa (Winter 1986). “‘Civilizing Rio de Janeiro’: The Public Health Campaign and the Riot of 1904”. Journal of Social History. 20: 301-322.

Nachman, Robert G. (July 1977). “Positivism and Revolution in Brazil’s First Republic: The 1904 Revolt”. The Americas. 34: 20-39.

Needell, Jeffrey D. (May 1987). “The Revolta Contra Vacina of 1904: The Revolt against ‘Modernization’ in Belle-Époque Rio de Janeiro”. The Hispanic American Historical Review. 67: 233-269. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackh18 (talk • contribs) 03:15, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

Since one of the problems with the article is the lack of sources, I think the ones you found will really improve it. Also, I would recommend finding more information about the topic to expand the article.

Jgriffith19 (talk) 20:26, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's great that you added sources to the article. I wonder if you could add any more information about the topic? Jgriffith19 (talk) 14:44, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Positivist[edit]

A group of florianist and positivist soldiers, with the support of some civil sectors, tried to take advantage of popular discontent to carry out a coup d'état

I suspect that "positivism" has yet another meaning that is not identical to the positivism linked here and not covered by positivism (disambiguation). --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:53, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, it's the exact same meaning. Positivism (the one developed by Comte) was one of the main ideologies in the early years of the First Brazilian Republic. Torimem (talk) 10:20, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Huh. Weird. Thanks for clarifying. --Hob Gadling (talk) 11:23, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See for example Benjamin Constant. Torimem (talk) 12:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]