Talk:Valentine v. United States

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Time tunnel?[edit]

"Treaty of 1939"? In a 1936 case...? TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 09:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I saw the same thing, and it should have been a citation of the Franco-American Extradition Treaty of 1909. The error here is a repetition of the error in this source: http://supreme.justia.com/us/299/5/case.html. The correct treaty is mentioned on this page: http://www.paclii.org/pg/LRC/wp/WP_24.html#fnB26. I'm correcting it, and I'll bet you five dollars that somebody will come along within 15 minutes to tell me I'm wrong. --Lockley (talk) 06:09, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]