Talk:Violin Concerto No. 2 (Joachim)

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

Untitled[edit]

He, incidentally, did not distinguish between Hungarian folk music and gypsy music.

In this agreeing with several modern scholars (not necessarily anti-Romani ones, but certainly ones against linguistic sideslips. Still a matter of dispute, at least; kicked up a firestorm when Liszt originally printed his book (first edition, the one without Sayn-Wittgenstein's anti-Semitic "emendations") and still does. Schissel | Sound the Note! 20:05, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Premiere[edit]

Pine's recording of the concerto gives an oddly late date for the premiere, so added evidence for an earlier date of performance (though actual date of premiere not established.) Schissel | Sound the Note! 05:02, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citation Style[edit]

Looking quickly through the article I can see three different citation sytles being used. Some quotes are supported by direct hyperlinks to articles with no details as to what the links point to. There are what seem to be references where bibliographic information is quoted directly in the article, which looks a bit sloppy. I've rewritten one reverence to use Harvard format citation, but am loath to proceed further down that road without concensus, which is really needed as I think the article itself needs a total overhaul. Graham1973 (talk) 03:34, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]