This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spectroscopy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.SpectroscopyWikipedia:WikiProject SpectroscopyTemplate:WikiProject SpectroscopySpectroscopy articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was merge (non-admin closure). Footlessmouse (talk) 21:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, IMO, a topic should not span multiple stub and start length articles. It is best to have all information on one article until such time as a content or size based split is appropriate. Footlessmouse (talk) 19:40, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Dodger67:, these pages are perfect examples of articles which do not need to be discussed in advance. You are allowed to blank-and-redirect pages and merge them together if you do not believe anyone will object. Looking at the history of the pages, only a couple people have ever edited them, that's why there is no discussion. Please feel free to merge the contents, see WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT and WP:MERGETEXT for additional information. Footlessmouse (talk) 19:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Footlessmouse I don't know enough about the subject to do such a merge. Ideally someone familiar with the topic should do it. If you're confident please go ahead and do it. Otherwise dropping a note at relevant wikiprojects might get an appropriate response. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:09, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.