Talk:Yellow anaconda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move proposal[edit]

Would anyone be opposed to moving this article to "Eunectes notaeus", in line with the rest of the articles in this series? --Jwinius (talk) 09:10, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 August 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 08:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Eunectes notaeusYellow anaconda – This very well known snake (one of the largest few snakes in the world by both weight and length) has a well-established and unambiguous common name, so we should use that name as the article title per WP:COMMONNAME / WP:NCFAUNA. The suggested name is the original name of the article, which was moved in 2008 after a comment saying that "Eunectes notaeus" would be better because it would be "in line with the rest of the articles in this series". "Yellow anaconda" has redirected here since then. I suggest to revert that move, since it seems contrary to Wikpedia common naming guidelines. Please also see the current similar RM discussions at Talk:Eunectes murinus, Talk:Python reticulatus, Talk:Python regius, and Talk:Python sebae, among others. —BarrelProof (talk) 00:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support anna kind a like this common name. Randy Kryn 14:18, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This requested move is currently being processed - RichT|C|E-Mail 21:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]