Template:Did you know nominations/Hale Holden

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 02:51, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Hale Holden[edit]

Hale Holden in 1917

  • Comment: Not a self-nom. --PFHLai (talk) 01:03, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Created by Slambo (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 01:03, 4 December 2013 (UTC).

  • Long enough and new enough. No obvious copyvios, but I don't have access to the books. Also, can't confirm the hook is cited in the book(s). Image is from 1917 and is fine at least from a US copyright perspective. Doesn't the presence of "when" make "at the time" unnecessary? Edwardx (talk) 18:57, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks. The hook has been tweaked and "at the time" is now removed. --PFHLai (talk) 20:05, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
  • On the Google Books page, use the "search within this book" search box. The result is this link to page 594; the verification is near the bottom of the page. Slambo (Speak) 20:06, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Agreed, the book confirms the hook. In the hook itself, I have replaced "also became" with "was", in the interests of brevity. 18:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC)