Template:Did you know nominations/Maling Kutang

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Maling Kutang's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 16:03, 26 February 2013 (UTC).

Maling Kutang[edit]

  • ... that Maling Kutang, filmed in under a week, included a gorilla costume and "magic" underwear and panties?

Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nominated at 06:11, 24 February 2013 (UTC).

  • Article - created new and moved from user space on 24 February, so new enough; 5771 characters of readable prose, so long enough; neutral; at least one inline citation to every paragraph except lead and plot; ran it through earwig with nothing thrown up, however refs are Indonesian, so no point with duplication detector; assessed as C class.
  • Hook - within length criteria at 105 characters; correctly formatted; AGF on refs but looks to be ref #4; and certainly caught my attention.
  • QPQ done; no image.
I expect I'm getting this wrong but although I'm seeing the 'under a week' part of the hook with inline ref #4 under the 'Production' section, the costume, underwear etc is just in the plot and not referenced? SagaciousPhil - Chat 13:01, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Correct, in so far as the second part of the hook is related to the plot. It's not unreferenced, but unfootnoted (which is acceptable per DYKSG D2). This supports both the gorilla costume and bra. We can strip the panties (no pun intended) if you don't feel comfortable AGFing something referenced to the film. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, I'm quite happy with this! SagaciousPhil - Chat 15:53, 26 February 2013 (UTC)