The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 14:36, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Requesting another reviewer to check the sources and confirm whether ProQuest supports the relevant information, or to report back if they can't access it. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
I just checked and TWL access doesn't let you see this source, so it will have to be someone who has access via some other method. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
allowing an AGF pass – nominations shouldn't sit for a month over non-policy issues. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
I like this for quirky, but if we found a better quirky hook, I am not opposed to moving it to another slot. Bruxton (talk) 14:35, 10 April 2023 (UTC)