Template:Did you know nominations/Papa Cristo's

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Papa Cristo's's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:54, 15 April 2013 (UTC).

Papa Cristo's[edit]

Created by Proudbolsahye (talk). Self nominated at 21:56, 25 March 2013 (UTC).

  • At over 2,000 characters, it meets the length criteria, and at least the English-language sources check out. The hook is interesting but I think "seen" is a stronger word than "featured" in this context. I'm pretty sure the movie poster needs to be removed as it does not meet the rules of fair use: "It to provide critical commentary on the film, event, etc. in question or of the poster itself, not solely for illustration" (see Licensing on this page). - Gilliam (talk) 08:52, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
  • The image most certainly cannot be used in the hook per a longstanding custom to not have fair use items on the main page. I also contend that it cannot be used in the Papa Cristo's article as it contributes nothing apart from decoration and is not extensively discussed in the article as an image. I will be bold and remove it here and there. Chris857 (talk) 16:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
  • It's fine with me Chris857. Thank you. Proudbolsahye (talk) 17:32, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
  • The article is fine now. The interesting bit of pop trivia will be an asset to the DYK column.- Gilliam (talk) 21:02, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination still needs to be approved; the "seen" vs. "featured" issue in the hook has not been addressed as yet. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:12, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
  • I'm being bold and changing seen -> featured in the hook. It looks like the nominator may have approved this on 26 March. I also verified the sourcing of that statement in the article. The article and hook meet DYK's length requirements. Good to go. - tucoxn\talk 01:46, 15 April 2013 (UTC)