Template:Did you know nominations/The Complex (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of The Complex (band)'s DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:40, 16 March 2013 (UTC).

The Complex (band)[edit]

  • Reviewed: Not required, not a self nom

Created by Idiotchalk (talk). Nominated by Crisco 1492 (talk) at 22:25, 12 March 2013 (UTC).

  • - The hook is confusing and needs work, especially the part about the noise generator; the date is okay; length is good; neutrality is good; the references are difficult to check. Haven't checked copyvio yet. --evrik (talk) 16:52, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
  • I fail to see anything confusing with the hook as it is. (person) was influenced by (other person/thing) while with (band) isn't exactly the most complex pattern around... — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:58, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Article - created new on 12 March, so new enough; 2678 characters of readable prose, so long enough; neutral; at least one inline citation to every paragraph; no copy vios detected using earwig/duplication detector - the only matches being flagged are within quotes; and un-assessed so not a stub.
  • Hook - easily within length criteria at concise 80 characters, so short and snappy; correctly formatted; correctly cited/supported by ref #7 in 'Musical style' section; and interesting enough for me to look at when I don't do songs/bands!
  • No QPQ required as not a self nom; no image.
Everything checks out (with AGF for offline ref) - article has had a speedy delete tag but it was contested/removed. SagaciousPhil - Chat 10:29, 15 March 2013 (UTC)