Template:Did you know nominations/Women Side by Side

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 20:07, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Women Side by Side[edit]

(

)

... that Chen Liting's film Women Side by Side (poster pictured), now recognized as a classic, was denounced as a "huge poisonous weed" during the Cultural Revolution?

Reviewed: HMCS New Westminster (K228)

5x expanded by Zanhe (talk). Self nominated at 10:48, 16 October 2013 (UTC).

Suggestion: add "during the Cultural Revolution" to the hook to make it more interesting. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:26, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion. It's been added. -Zanhe (talk) 18:51, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

User:Qwertyus has not responded here or to my notice on his/her talk page in nearly two weeks. New reviewer needed. -Zanhe (talk) 05:20, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

– The plot summary is too long for a 102 minutes film. Hook fact is interesting and cited with an inline citation. Assuming good faith for a Chinese language source. Image is in public domain and used in the article. — Bill william compton^Talk 19:19, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Good to go. 5x expansion checks out, article is thoroughly supported by citations, hook is well-supported, I did not find any close paraphrasing of the cited sources, and the image license is OK. The length of the plot summary should not be an issue for DYK; anyway, the details of plot and character apparently are what make this film a classic. --Orlady (talk) 14:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)