User:سائغ/E3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The bombe detected when a contradiction had occurred and ruled out that setting, moving on to the next. Most of the possible settings would cause contradictions and be discarded, leaving only a few to be investigated in detail. A contradiction would occur when an enciphered letter would be turned back into the same plaintext letter, which was impossible with the Enigma. The first bombe was installed on 18 March 1940.[1]

By late 1941, Turing and his fellow cryptanalysts Gordon Welchman, Hugh Alexander and Stuart Milner-Barry were frustrated. Building on the work of the Poles, they had set up a good working system for decrypting Enigma signals, but their limited staff and bombes meant they could not translate all the signals. In the summer, they had considerable success, and shipping losses had fallen to under 100,000 tons a month; however, they badly needed more resources to keep abreast of German adjustments. They had tried to get more people and fund more bombes through the proper channels, but had failed.[2]

On 28 October they wrote directly to Winston Churchill explaining their difficulties, with Turing as the first named. They emphasised how small their need was compared with the vast expenditure of men and money by the forces and compared with the level of assistance they could offer to the forces.[2] As Andrew Hodges, biographer of Turing, later wrote, "This letter had an electric effect."[3] Churchill wrote a memo to General Ismay, which read: "ACTION THIS DAY. Make sure they have all they want on extreme priority and report to me that this has been done." On 18 November, the chief of the secret service reported that every possible measure was being taken.[3] The cryptographers at Bletchley Park did not know of the Prime Minister's response, but as Milner-Barry recalled, "All that we did notice was that almost from that day the rough ways began miraculously to be made smooth."[4] More than two hundred bombes were in operation by the end of the war.[5]

Statue of Turing by Stephen Kettle at Bletchley Park, commissioned by Sidney Frank, built from half a million pieces of Welsh slate.[6]

Hut 8 and the naval Enigma[edit]

Turing decided to tackle the particularly difficult problem of German naval Enigma "because no one else was doing anything about it and I could have it to myself".[7] In December 1939, Turing solved the essential part of the naval indicator system, which was more complex than the indicator systems used by the other services.[7][8]

That same night, he also conceived of the idea of Banburismus, a sequential statistical technique (what Abraham Wald later called sequential analysis) to assist in breaking the naval Enigma, "though I was not sure that it would work in practice, and was not, in fact, sure until some days had actually broken."[7] For this, he invented a measure of weight of evidence that he called the ban. Banburismus could rule out certain sequences of the Enigma rotors, substantially reducing the time needed to test settings on the bombes.[9] Later this sequential process of accumulating sufficient weight of evidence using decibans (one tenth of a ban) was used in Cryptanalysis of the Lorenz cipher.[10]

Turing travelled to the United States in November 1942[11] and worked with US Navy cryptanalysts on the naval Enigma and bombe construction in Washington; he also visited their Computing Machine Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio.

Turing's reaction to the American bombe design was far from enthusiastic:

  • The American Bombe programme was to produce 336 Bombes, one for each wheel order. I used to smile inwardly at the conception of Bombe hut routine implied by this programme, but thought that no particular purpose would be served by pointing out that we would not really use them in that way.

Their test (of commutators) can hardly be considered conclusive as they were not testing for the bounce with electronic stop finding devices. Nobody seems to be told about rods or offiziers or banburismus unless they are really going to do something about it.[12]

During this trip, he also assisted at Bell Labs with the development of secure speech devices.[13] He returned to Bletchley Park in March 1943. During his absence, Hugh Alexander had officially assumed the position of head of Hut 8, although Alexander had been de facto head for some time (Turing having little interest in the day-to-day running of the section). Turing became a general consultant for cryptanalysis at Bletchley Park.[14]

Alexander wrote of Turing's contribution:

  • There should be no question in anyone's mind that Turing's work was the biggest factor in Hut 8's success. In the early days, he was the only cryptographer who thought the problem worth tackling and not only was he primarily responsible for the main theoretical work within the Hut, but he also shared with Welchman and Keen the chief credit for the invention of the bombe. It is always difficult to say that anyone is 'absolutely indispensable', but if anyone was indispensable to Hut 8, it was Turing. The pioneer's work always tends to be forgotten when experience and routine later make everything seem easy and many of us in Hut 8 felt that the magnitude of Turing's contribution was never fully realised by the outside world.[15]

Turingery[edit]

In July 1942, Turing devised a technique termed Turingery (or jokingly Turingismus)[16] for use against the Lorenz cipher messages produced by the Germans' new Geheimschreiber (secret writer) machine. This was a teleprinter rotor cipher attachment codenamed Tunny at Bletchley Park. Turingery was a method of wheel-breaking, i.e., a procedure for working out the cam settings of Tunny's wheels.[17] He also introduced the Tunny team to Tommy Flowers who, under the guidance of Max Newman, went on to build the Colossus computer, the world's first programmable digital electronic computer, which replaced a simpler prior machine (the Heath Robinson), and whose superior speed allowed the statistical decryption techniques to be applied usefully to the messages.[18] Some have mistakenly said that Turing was a key figure in the design of the Colossus computer. Turingery and the statistical approach of Banburismus undoubtedly fed into the thinking about cryptanalysis of the Lorenz cipher,[19][20] but he was not directly involved in the Colossus development.[21]

Delilah[edit]

Following his work at Bell Labs in the US,[22] Turing pursued the idea of electronic enciphering of speech in the telephone system. In the latter part of the war, he moved to work for the Secret Service's Radio Security Service (later HMGCC) at Hanslope Park. At the park, he further developed his knowledge of electronics with the assistance of engineer Donald Bayley. Together they undertook the design and construction of a portable secure voice communications machine codenamed Delilah.[23] The machine was intended for different applications, but it lacked the capability for use with long-distance radio transmissions. In any case, Delilah was completed too late to be used during the war. Though the system worked fully, with Turing demonstrating it to officials by encrypting and decrypting a recording of a Winston Churchill speech, Delilah was not adopted for use.[24] Turing also consulted with Bell Labs on the development of SIGSALY, a secure voice system that was used in the later years of the war.

Early computers and the Turing test[edit]

Plaque, 78 High Street, Hampton

Between 1945 and 1947, Turing lived in Hampton, London,[25] while he worked on the design of the ACE (Automatic Computing Engine) at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL). He presented a paper on 19 February 1946, which was the first detailed design of a stored-program computer.[26] Von Neumann's incomplete First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC had predated Turing's paper, but it was much less detailed and, according to John R. Womersley, Superintendent of the NPL Mathematics Division, it "contains a number of ideas which are Dr. Turing's own".[27]

Although ACE was a feasible design, the effect of the Official Secrets Act surrounding the wartime work at Bletchley Park made it impossible for Turing to explain the basis of his analysis of how a computer installation involving human operators would work.[28] This led to delays in starting the project and he became disillusioned. In late 1947 he returned to Cambridge for a sabbatical year during which he produced a seminal work on Intelligent Machinery that was not published in his lifetime.[29] While he was at Cambridge, the Pilot ACE was being built in his absence. It executed its first program on 10 May 1950, and a number of later computers around the world owe much to it, including the English Electric DEUCE and the American Bendix G-15. The full version of Turing's ACE was not built until after his death.[30]

According to the memoirs of the German computer pioneer Heinz Billing from the Max Planck Institute for Physics, published by Genscher, Düsseldorf, there was a meeting between Turing and Konrad Zuse.[31] It took place in Göttingen in 1947. The interrogation had the form of a colloquium. Participants were Womersley, Turing, Porter from England and a few German researchers like Zuse, Walther, and Billing (for more details see Herbert Bruderer, Konrad Zuse und die Schweiz).

In 1948, Turing was appointed reader in the Mathematics Department at the Victoria University of Manchester. A year later, he became deputy director of the Computing Machine Laboratory, where he worked on software for one of the earliest stored-program computers—the Manchester Mark 1. Turing wrote the first version of the Programmer's Manual for this machine, and was recruited by Ferranti as a consultant in the development of their commercialised machine, the Ferranti Mark 1. He continued to be paid consultancy fees by Ferranti until his death.[32] During this time, he continued to do more abstract work in mathematics,[33] and in "Computing Machinery and Intelligence" (Mind, October 1950), Turing addressed the problem of artificial intelligence, and proposed an experiment that became known as the Turing test, an attempt to define a standard for a machine to be called "intelligent". The idea was that a computer could be said to "think" if a human interrogator could not tell it apart, through conversation, from a human being.[34] In the paper, Turing suggested that rather than building a program to simulate the adult mind, it would be better to produce a simpler one to simulate a child's mind and then to subject it to a course of education. A reversed form of the Turing test is widely used on the Internet; the CAPTCHA test is intended to determine whether the user is a human or a computer.

  1. ^ Oakley 2006, p. 40/03B
  2. ^ a b Hodges 1983, p. 218
  3. ^ a b Hodges 1983, p. 221
  4. ^ Copeland, The Essential Turing, pp. 336–337 Archived 18 February 2015 at the Wayback Machine.
  5. ^ Copeland, Jack; Proudfoot, Diane (May 2004). "Alan Turing, Codebreaker and Computer Pioneer". alanturing.net. Archived from the original on 9 July 2007. Retrieved 27 July 2007.
  6. ^ "Bletchley Park Unveils Statue Commemorating Alan Turing". Archived from the original on 30 June 2007. Retrieved 30 June 2007.
  7. ^ a b c Mahon 1945, p. 14
  8. ^ Leavitt 2007, pp. 184–186
  9. ^ Gladwin, Lee (Fall 1997). "Alan Turing, Enigma, and the Breaking of German Machine Ciphers in World War II" (PDF). Prologue Magazine. Fall 1997: 202–217. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 June 2019. Retrieved 13 April 2019 – via National Archives.
  10. ^ Good, Jack; Michie, Donald; Timms, Geoffrey (1945), General Report on Tunny: With Emphasis on Statistical Methods, Part 3 Organisation: 38 Wheel-breaking from Key, Page 293, UK Public Record Office HW 25/4 and HW 25/5, archived from the original on 21 April 2019, retrieved 13 April 2019
  11. ^ Hodges 1983, pp. 242–245
  12. ^ Turing, Alan M. (2001). "Visit to National Cash Register Corporation of Dayton, Ohio". Cryptologia. 25 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1080/0161-110191889734. S2CID 14207094.
  13. ^ Hodges 1983, pp. 245–253
  14. ^ "Marshall Legacy Series: Codebreaking – Events". marshallfoundation.org. Archived from the original on 7 April 2019. Retrieved 7 April 2019.
  15. ^ Alexander & circa 1945, p. 42
  16. ^ Copeland 2006, p. 380
  17. ^ Copeland 2006, p. 381
  18. ^ Copeland 2006, p. 72
  19. ^ Gannon 2007, p. 230
  20. ^ Hilton 2006, pp. 197–199
  21. ^ Copeland 2006, pp. 382, 383
  22. ^ Hodges 1983, pp. 245–250
  23. ^ Hodges 1983, p. 273
  24. ^ Hodges 1983, p. 346
  25. ^ Plaque #1619 on Open Plaques
  26. ^ Copeland 2006, p. 108
  27. ^ Randell, Brian (1980). "A History of Computing in the Twentieth Century: Colossus" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 January 2012. Retrieved 27 January 2012. citing Womersley, J.R. (13 February 1946). "'ACE' Machine Project". Executive Committee, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex.
  28. ^ Hodges, Andrew (2014). Alan Turing: The Enigma. Princeton University Press. p. 416. ISBN 978-0-691-16472-4.
  29. ^ See Copeland 2004b, pp. 410–432
  30. ^ "Turing at NPL". Archived from the original on 5 July 2015. Retrieved 3 July 2015.
  31. ^ Bruderer, Herbert. "Did Alan Turing interrogate Konrad Zuse in Göttingen in 1947?" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 May 2013. Retrieved 7 February 2013.
  32. ^ Swinton, Jonathan (2019). Alan Turing's Manchester. Manchester: Infang Publishing. ISBN 978-0-9931789-2-4. Archived from the original on 17 February 2019. Retrieved 18 March 2019.
  33. ^ Turing, A.M. (1948). "Rounding-Off Errors in Matrix Processes". The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics. 1: 287–308. doi:10.1093/qjmam/1.1.287. hdl:10338.dmlcz/103139.
  34. ^ Harnad, Stevan (2008) The Annotation Game: On Turing (1950) on Computing, Machinery and Intelligence Archived 18 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine. In: Epstein, Robert & Peters, Grace (Eds.) Parsing the Turing Test: Philosophical and Methodological Issues in the Quest for the Thinking Computer. Springer