User:BrightStarSky
stuff
|
Tip of the day...
Main page - Did you know
Wikipedia:Did you know... is a section you can see on the Main Page. Wikipedia:Did you know (WP:DYK) is the project page for the "Did you know" section. The DYK section showcases new or expanded articles that are selected through an informal review process. It is not a general trivia section. For the discussion page see WT:DYK. Beginners should consult this Did You Know glossary if they don't understand any of the terms used. Beginners may like to start by looking at a summary of our many rules: this provides links to pages with more detailed explanations (which in turn may link to even more detailed pages). – – To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use
{{tip of the day}} |
A barnstar for you![edit]
The Resilient Barnstar | |
Thanks for your well referenced updates. You do a great job here! Anir1uph | talk | contrib 05:16, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
A Barnstar For You[edit]
The Resilient Barnstar | ||
You're doing wonderfully. My deepest respect to you for your resilience. You have become a productive editor, and a real asset to the project. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
and you deserve this:
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
For making 8,428 edits, 99.09% of which were to the mainspace. Very, very few editors can claim such a high percentage. You are a most valued editor. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:24, 25 November 2012 (UTC) |
John Mooney's Page[edit]
Hi,
I read an article in the Economist recently that had a bit in about John Mooney, and when I looked at his page on Wikipedia I noticed that you had made a lot of edits to the page, so as someone who has an interest in him, I thought I;d ask your advice before updating his page. Basically, given his statements on his past troubles with mental health, I was wondering whether it was worth mentioning. My perspective is that I think that to have been so open is a very courageous thing, and I think he deserves credit for doing so, especially in the light of cricket's long-standing problems in that area. But I'm concerned that in mentioning it in some depth on his page, might seem like oblique criticism, which is the opposite of what I intend.
I'm happy to do the work, but I was just looking for someone else's perspective. Have you any thoughts?