User:Cmm888/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ancient Egyptian Fortresses[edit]

Fortifications within Ancient Egypt were built in times of conflict between rival principalities. [1] Out of all fortresses analyzed within this time frame, most (if not all) were built of the same materials. The only exception to the rule were some fortresses from the Old Kingdom as fortresses such as the fort of Buhen utilized stone with the creation of it's walls. The main walls were mainly built with mud brick but were reinforced with other materials such as timber. Rocks were also utilized to not only preserve them from erosion as well as paving.[1] Secondary walls would be built outside of fortresses main walls and were relatively close to one another. As a result, this would prove to be a challenge to invaders were as they forced to destroy this fortification before they could reach the main walls of the fort.[2] Another strategy was utilized if the enemy managed to break through the first barrier. Upon making it to the main wall, a ditch would be constructed that would be positioned between the secondary and first walls. The purpose of this was to place the enemy in an position that would leave them exposed to the enemy, making the invaders susceptible to arrow fire.[2]The position of this ditch Walls within the interior of fortresses would become demilitarized during times of unity; leading to them being demolished. The parts that were used to construct said walls could then be reused, making the overall design extremely beneficial.

Fortresses within Ancient Egypt held multiple functions. During the Middle Kingdom Period, the Twelfth Dynasty of Egypt would establish means of control throughout the Nubian Riverside by creating fortified stations. The location of Egyptian fortresses were not exclusive to just the riverside. Sites within both Egypt and Nubia would be placed on terrain that was either rocky or sandy.[2] The purpose behind this method was to spread it's influence throughout the region as well as discourage rival groups from raiding the sites.[1] Inspections of these forts in Nubia have led to the discovery of copper smelting materials which suggest a relationship between miners in the region [1] The occupation of these Nubian forts suggests a trade relationship between the two parties. Miners would collect the materials and would transfer them to these forts in exchange for food and water. Up until the Thirteenth dynasty, Egypt would hold control of Nubia through the use of these fortresses.[1]

Pelusium Fortress[edit]

The Pelusium fortress served as means of protection from invaders coming towards the Nile Delta[3]. While the site served this role for more than a millennium, Pelusium was also known for being a center of trade (both land and Maritime). Trade was primarily conducted between Egypt and the Levant.[3] While information is not concrete in terms of the fortresses establishment, it is suggested that Pelusium was erected during either the Middle Kingdom period or during the Saite and Persian periods from the 16th and 18th century.[3]Pelusium is also seen as a integral part of the nile as other ruins were found outside it's borders, indicating that the area was large in occupation. Architecturally, structures of Pelusium (such as it's gates and towers) appear to be built from limestone. A metalurgy industry is also indicated to have taken place at this site due to the discovery of copper-ore.[3] Excavations of the site have also discovered older materials that date back some of the early dynasties. The found materials include Basalt, Granite, Diorite, Marble, and Quartzite.[3] How these materials were utilized during the operation of is unclear as they may have been placed at the location more recently.[3]Seeing as the fortress was placed in close proximity to the Nile River, the fort was largely surrounded by both dunes and coastal lines[3].

There are multiple reasons that caused the decline of the Pelusium fortress. During it's existence, events such as the Bubonic Plague appeared in the mediterranean for the first time and multiple fires within the fortress occurred[3] Conquest from the Persians as well as a decrease in trade could also be attributed to the increase also may have lead to a increase in abandonment. Officially, natural reasons are what led to Pelusium falling apart such as tectonic motions.[3] The official desertion of the site is attributed to the time of the crusades.[3]

Fortress of Jaffa[edit]

Jaffa Fortress was prominent during the New Kingdom period of Egypt. It served as both a fortress and a port on the Mediterranean coast. To this day, Jaffa serves as a primary Egyptian port.[4] Originally under the control of the Canaanites, the site fell under the control of the Egyptian Empire. Because of a lack of evidence, it is unclear as to what exactly caused the succession from Canaanite to Egyptian occupation.[4] During the Late Bronze Age, the site was successfully in holding campaigns from Pharaohs of the 18th dynasty.[4]In terms of it's functions, the site held multiple roles. It is suggested that Jaffa's primary function was to serve as a granary for the Egyptian Army.

Rameses gate, which is dated to the Late Bronze Age, serves as a connection to the fortress. Ramparts were also discovered with the fortress Upon excavation, the site hosted multiple items such as bowls, imported jars, pot stands, and beer and bread which further emphasis the importance of these items to the area[4]. The discovery of these objects show a close connection between the the storing of food and the creation of ceramic items.[4]

Mastaba[edit]

Mastabas are burial tombs that hold royal significance. As chosen by Egyptian rulers, many of the of tombs found throughout time were located along the Nile river.[5] The structural exterior regarding Mastabas varies throughout history but there is a noticeable evolution of the course of Egyptian dynasties. The Mastabas of the First Egyptian Dynasty would be created through the use of stepped bricks[6]. The design would then evolve by the time of the Fourth Dynasty as the structural exterior change from brick to stone.[6] The reasoning behind the stepped designs of Mastabas is connected to the idea of "accession".[6] Lateral penetration was a concern in when constructing tombs. In order to prevent damage to the structure, brickwork layers were placed around the base of structure.[6] Mastabas from the old empire, took upon a pyramid design structure.[5] This design was largely reserved for rulers, such as the king, and his family as a means for burial.[5] Other design characteristics regarding Mastabas from the old empire include having rectangular outlines, walls that were slanted which were made of stone and brick materials, and having the axis of a building run both North and South.[5] Multiple elements make up the interior of Mastabas such as an offering chamber, statues for the dead, and a vault beneath which held sarcophagi.[5] Mastabas would be presented as being elevated as By the end of the old Empire, the usage of these tombs were abandoned.

The Pyramid of Ahmose illustrates the decrease in structural design quality of New Kingdom Egypt.
  1. ^ a b c d e Lawrence, A. (1965). Ancient Egyptian Fortifications. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology,51(1), 69-94.
  2. ^ a b c Clarke, S. (1916). ANCIENT EGYPTIAN FRONTIER FORTRESSES. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 3, 155.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Stanley, Jean-Daniel, et al. “Pelusium, an Ancient Port Fortress on Egypt's Nile Delta Coast: Its Evolving Environmental Setting from Foundation to Demise.” Journal of Coastal Research, vol. 24, no. 2, 2008, pp. 451–462. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/30137849.
  4. ^ a b c d e Aaron A. Burke, et al. “Excavations of the New Kingdom Fortress in Jaffa, 2011–2014: Traces of Resistance to Egyptian Rule in Canaan.” American Journal of Archaeology, vol. 121, no. 1, 2017, pp. 85–133. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.3764/aja.121.1.0085.
  5. ^ a b c d e L. E. R. “Two Mastaba Chambers.” Museum of Fine Arts Bulletin, vol. 8, no. 45, 1910, pp. 19–20. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/4423469.
  6. ^ a b c d Badawy, Alexander. “The Ideology of the Superstructure of the Mastaba-Tomb in Egypt.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies, vol. 15, no. 3, 1956, pp. 180–183. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/542310.