User:Nancy/Desk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

desk


WP:RFA

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
RfA candidate S O N S % Status Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Elli 0 0 0 0 Discussion 16:53, 7 June 2024 6 days, 4 hours no report
Admin statistics
Action Count
Edits 21366
Edits+Deleted 25360
Pages deleted 15561
Revisions deleted 6
Pages restored 118
Pages protected 417
Pages unprotected 21
Protections modified 16
Users blocked 1248
Users reblocked 27
Users unblocked 18
User rights modified 13
Users created 1


Purge the cache of this page


WP:AIV

commenting template

Result Shorthand Longhand
Checking: :{{AIV|chk}} :{{AIV|check}}
wait :{{AIV|wt|Z}} :{{AIV|wait|Z}}
Warned user. :{{AIV|w}} :{{AIV|warn}}
Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. :{{AIV|i}} :{{AIV|ins}}
No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. :{{AIV|f}} :{{AIV|nfw}}
Stale warning. Last warning was issued Y ago. :{{AIV|ow|Y}} :{{AIV|oldwarn|Y}}
Will actively monitor user. :{{AIV|m}} :{{AIV|monitor}}
Question: :{{AIV|q}} :{{AIV|ques}}
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. :{{AIV|a}} :{{AIV|ani}}
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Usernames for administrator attention. :{{AIV|u}} :{{AIV|uaa}}
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Requests for page protection. :{{AIV|r}} :{{AIV|rpp}}
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Sockpuppet investigations. :{{AIV|sp}} :{{AIV|ssp}}
Note: :{{AIV|n}} :{{AIV|note}}
Note: IP addresses are generally not blocked indefinitely. Please see the blocking policy for more information. :{{AIV|in}} :{{AIV|indef}}
Appears to be a shared IP address, used by multiple users. :{{AIV|s}} :{{AIV|shared}}
User has been inappropriately warned. 4im warnings are appropriate for severe vandalism and defamation only. :{{AIV|4im}} :{{AIV|onlywarn}}
Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. :{{AIV|c}} :{{AIV|cont}}
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. :{{AIV|ns}} :{{AIV|new}}
Blocks are preventative, not intended to be used as punishment. :{{AIV|np}} :{{AIV|notpunish}}
Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. :{{AIV|nv}} :{{AIV|notvandal}}
Page deleted. :{{AIV|d}} :{{AIV|del}}
Stale report. User has not edited in X. :{{AIV|e|X}} :{{AIV|stale|X}}
Report was good at the time, but is now stale. (X since last edit) Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. :{{AIV|sn|X}} :{{AIV|nowstale|X}}
merge :{{AIV|me}} :{{AIV|merge}}


Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

WP:CSD / proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested -1
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages -3
Spam pages 0
Notability not asserted 0

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for at least 5 days:
( source / chronological order )

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

Usernames for administrator attention

commenting template

Result Shorthand Longhand
Wait until the user edits. :{{UAA|wt}} :{{UAA|wait}}
Being discussed with the user. :{{UAA|d}} :{{UAA|disc}}
drfcn :{{UAA|dr}} :{{UAA|drfcn}}
aiv :{{UAA|v}} :{{UAA|aiv}}
ani :{{UAA|a}} :{{UAA|ani}}
rpp :{{UAA|r}} :{{UAA|rpp}}
ssp :{{UAA|sp}} :{{UAA|ssp}}
talk :{{UAA|uw}} :{{UAA|talk}}
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at Requests for comment/User names if they disagree with your concerns. :{{UAA|rc}} :{{UAA|rfcn}}
notb :{{UAA|b}} :{{UAA|notb}}
Question: :{{UAA|q}} :{{UAA|question}}
Note: :{{UAA|n}} :{{UAA|note}}
Stale: This account has not been used in the last 2–3 weeks. :{{UAA|e}} :{{UAA|stale}}
merge :{{UAA|me}} :{{UAA|merge}}


Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection

commenting template

Result Code Normalized code
Semi-protected {{RFPP|s}} {{RFPP|semi}}
Fully protected {{RFPP|p}} {{RFPP|full}}
Move protected {{RFPP|m}} {{RFPP|move}}
Creation protected {{RFPP|t}} {{RFPP|salt}}
Done {{RFPP|do}} {{RFPP|done}}
Declined {{RFPP|d}} {{RFPP|deny}}
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. {{RFPP|nea}} {{RFPP|nact}}
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. {{RFPP|np}} {{RFPP|npre}}
{{RFPP|fa}} {{RFPP|mpfa}}
User(s) blocked. {{RFPP|b}} {{RFPP|bloc}}
Unprotected {{RFPP|u}} {{RFPP|unpr}}
Not unprotected {{RFPP|nu}} {{RFPP|noun}}
Already unprotected. {{RFPP|au}} {{RFPP|isun}}
Already protected. {{RFPP|ap}} {{RFPP|ispr}}
Already done. {{RFPP|ad}} {{RFPP|isdo}}
Question: {{RFPP|q}} {{RFPP|ques}}
Note: {{RFPP|n}} {{RFPP|note}}


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Cushitic-speaking peoples

Reason: IP editor & another editor have been edit-warring for eleven days. I encouraged them to discuss on Talk. IP editor is not happy with input of other editors & has returned to edit warring. Pathawi (talk) 01:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Insurgency in Punjab, India

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced information. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 01:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 10:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Elliana Walmsley

Persistent Violations of the Biographies of Living Persons and Vandalism at the same time: The same I.P. as last time (who is likely a sockpuppet) vandalized the page and changed the national of Walmsley to Greek, and in the Infobox. They keep doing this. They have done this at least 5 or times, I think it's best to indef-semi-protect or pending changes protect. And please, PLEASE, I beseech you to block the person who is changing the nationality. 70.50.199.125 (talk) 01:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Prior semi-protections failed to stop vandalism after protection ends. Seems like there are still useful edits from anon editors. – robertsky (talk) 11:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Example Article Name

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Yogi Anuj Goswami (talk) 06:32, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, wrong target page, but judging from the reqeuster's contribution history, Jogi (caste) looks like the article they are requesting for. which also has not enough disruptive activities yet. – robertsky (talk) 10:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

2024 Mannheim stabbing

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from User:SelfStarter2, reverted 2 edits. F3ew (talk) 07:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @F3ew warning to the editor on their talk page may be more appropriate for now. – robertsky (talk) 10:26, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Will try warning but given the history of 'vandalism' tags on their contributions page, I'm not very hopeful that it will work. – F3ew 11:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

List of characters in Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai

Reason: Indefinite Semi-Protection: persistent vandalism since previous protections expired, constant tampering with main cast Imsaneikigai (talk) 10:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Hindu nationalism

Reason: Indefinite Semi-Protection: persistent vandalism from unregistered users. Related to Hindutva which has indefinite semi-protection. Pachu Kannan (talk) 11:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

2024 Indian general election

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Enable ECP until atleast 5th June 2024 as editing is being made on predictions. Thewikizoomer (talk) 12:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Israel-Hamas War

I would like to request that... (the map be updated to show that Israel now controls the entire Gaza-Egypt border) . LordOfWalruses (talk) 15:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Daniyal Chaudhary

n March 2024, he was added to the FIA's Provincial National Identification List (PNIL) to prevent him from leaving the country after he was made part of an investigation related to the assassination of Chaudhry Muhammad Adnan, an independent candidate, ran from constituency NA-57 Rawalpindi-VI in the 2024 Pakistani general election.[3] According to media reports, Adnan had political differences with Chaudhary and he had repeatedly expressed concerns about his safety, indicating that he perceived Chaudhary as a threat. Adnan made it explicit that if any harm came to him, he would hold Chaudhary accountable.[4] World No 1 strategist (talk) 23:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.


WP:RFPERM (rollback)

Rollback

User:Myrealnamm

Hi there,

I am requesting rollback rights so I can revert vandalism faster. I've been using Twinkle and reverting vandalism for more than a month now and I finally feel like it's the time. Around last month I've requested Rollback rights but it got declined because I had limited experience in reverting vandalism. I now have over 200 mainspace edits, reverting for more than a month now, and only this that might count as edit warring. Having rollback rights would give me access to tools such as AntiVandal which will help me revert vandalism easier. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) 21:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Oh, and yes, constantly warning users about their edits (unless they've vandalized past their fourth or 4im warning, and then I'll go to AIV). Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) 21:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 21:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
I'm concerned by this complaint on your talk page. Do you still think the edit referenced here should have been reverted? Please explain your reasoning. -Fastily 02:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Oh. I'll explain that:
If I recall, what happened was I didn't see their edit summary and I only saw the edits that were blanking content. So, to answer your question, I shouldn't have reverted those edits because there were reasonable explanations for blanking. That was my mistake. Are there any other problems?
Thanks, Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 12:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
I didn't see the explanation and that's how it led to this and this. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 13:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
So help me understand: if you knew you made a mistake, then why did it take 5 days (during which you ignored the IP) and me calling it out here for you to rectify it? -Fastily 20:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
I didn't, I just realized. Sorry for any confusion that I made. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 21:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC) What I meant was I didn’t assume good faith and check what the IP was referring to. I will assume good faith even more from now to prevent things like this from happening again. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 21:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
When in doubt, do not revert. I'd rather that you allow a few bad edits through than inappropriately revert one constructive edit. RC patrol is not a race to see who can revert the most, you should be taking special care with every revert you make. If you're receiving complaints/questions on your talk page, then you need to address these in a timely manner. To be honest, I think you'd benefit from more experience; please spend another month consistently patrolling before reapplying. That said, closing as  Not done Fastily 21:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Ok. Thank you! Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 13:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
FYI I do have an alternate account that I often use, at User:Myrealnamm-alt. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 21:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Ankermast

I am a German Wikipedian and have been active on enwiki as vandalism fighter since April, mostly using Twinkle sind SWViewer and always warning editors after reverting their contributions. Currently I have made almost 800 Edits here, which mostly consist of vandalism control. On dewiki I am member of the CVU, have more than 17000 edits as well as rollback rights. [2] I would like to be granted rollback rights as they would allow me fighting vandalism more efficiently and faster. Thanks Ankermast (talk) 08:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 20:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
As I am using Twinkle, it becomes clear that the vast majority of my reverts are followed by a warning when looking at my contributions. Regarding your examples: 1. I restored an older version edited by two other users: an anonymous user which I did warn and a user which removed some of the vandalism by the IP, which I would not warn as this edit was constructive. 2. Here, the user removed the contribution by themselves except for a blank which I removed with restoring the latest constructive version. Here, as it seemed like a test edit and as the user removed it, I just removed said blank. 3. Out of hundreds of reverts, there are some cases in which I do not warn the editor. These are natural and I can’t do more than making the promise that like now, I am going to warn every vandal, to the best of my ability.
Best regards Ankermast (talk) 20:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 21:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Yes, I make that promise. Ankermast (talk) 21:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for confirming,  Done -Fastily 09:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for account creator.



Special:Newpages

1 June 2024