User talk:103.52.220.45

April 2024[edit]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Arvind Kejriwal for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. — hako9 (talk) 09:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please list an actual rule whose violation has taken place because of that comment or call an Admin and have them explain to me IN DEPTH. You simply can't willy nilly censor speech that you don't like. 103.52.220.45 (talk) 17:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Arvind_Kejriwal, you may be blocked from editing. Grabup (talk) 17:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Point to an actual rule which I have broken. I didn't vandalise anything. You're getting on my nerve. Mind your behaviour and language! I am politely warning you! 103.52.220.45 (talk) 18:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@103.52.220.45, Read WP:TALK#POSITIVE, which says “ Article talk pages should be used to discuss ways to improve an article; not to criticize, pick apart, or vent about the current status of an article or its subject. This is especially true on the talk pages of biographies of living people.” Your message on the Talk page of Arvind Kejriwal is not for imroving the article at all. Please refrain from these type of edits or I have to request admins to take actions against you. Grabup (talk) 18:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have any rules per se, but there are policies and guidelines, such as WP:TPG, WP:NOTFORUM, and WP:3RR, the last of which is a brightline rule that you are very close to breaking. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9D10:ED34:8A2B:CE7E (talk) 18:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9D10:ED34:8A2B:CE7E (talk) 18:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YOU STARTED THE EDIT WAR. EXPLAIN WHY WAS MY ORIGINAL COMMENT DELETED IN THE FIRST PLACE? 103.52.220.45 (talk) 18:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have not once edited that page, WP:3RR is a brightline you may not make more than three reverts in 24 hours using any number of IPs or accounts and you are very close to violating it. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9D10:ED34:8A2B:CE7E (talk) 18:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YOU ARE INTENTIONALLY INSTIGATING ME. EXPLAIN WHY MY ORIGINAL COMMENT GOT DELETED IN THE FIRST PLACE? 103.52.220.45 (talk) 18:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@103.52.220.45. Read WP:TALK#POSITIVE, which says “ Article talk pages should be used to discuss ways to improve an article; not to criticize, pick apart, or vent about the current status of an article or its subject. This is especially true on the talk pages of biographies of living people.” Your message on the Talk page of Arvind Kejriwal is not for imroving the article at all. Please refrain from these type of edits or I have to request admins to take actions against you. Grabup (talk) 18:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it violated WP:TPG, and WP:YELLING is also a violation. Using caps lock as cruise control is rarely a good idea anyway. Please read WP:TPG, WP:NOT, and WP:EW in their entirety before making further complaints, thanks. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9D10:ED34:8A2B:CE7E (talk) 18:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My original comment didn't violate anything. I posted my comment in ORDER to change the tone. You are not assuming good faith. Instead of discussing with me on how to improve the article. you keep deleting my comment. Why? 103.52.220.45 (talk) 18:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@103.52.220.45, Your comment doesn't identify any specific changes; instead, it merely suggests that the article is being influenced by the left. If you aim to enhance the article, please articulate precisely what changes you propose and the reasons behind them. Grabup (talk) 18:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you bother to ask me? Did you?? Apologize for that and then discuss. 103.52.220.45 (talk) 18:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're very close to being blocked for disruptive behavior (WP:DE). Your comments were removed because they were WP:POLEMIC and WP:BATTLEGROUND. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You think your ability to block an IP or user gives you power over me? Don't you think you are being a tad tyrranical by siding with anti-freespeech people here being an admin yourself? huh? Change yourself. Do something useful in reality. Get out more. Live!

Stop wasting your life dear. That's my actual suggestion to kids like you. 103.52.220.45 (talk) 18:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly not here to build Wikipedia. Grabup (talk) 18:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing here? Please stop commenting on this page if you can control yourself. 103.52.220.45 (talk) 18:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You will be blocked soon for your edits, (Bujhle prio). Grabup (talk) 18:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking in tongues? 103.52.220.131 (talk) 19:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of this is constructive, please read WP:TPG, WP:EW, and WP:NOT in their entirety as instructed then once you can confirm having done so you should clear up any remaining confusion by asking questions at the WP:TEAHOUSE. In the meantime I suggest you explain why you should not be blocked for violating 3RR at WP:ANEW. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9D10:ED34:8A2B:CE7E (talk) 18:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And you are the ultimate arbiter of what's constructive now? Is it? Why are YOU still here? 103.52.220.45 (talk) 18:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Believe it or not trying to enhance understanding by linking to resources and information that if followed will improve editor skill. Since you have been blocked I know you can't respond for now, but you can still read those pages and I suggest you do so. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9D10:ED34:8A2B:CE7E (talk) 18:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9D10:ED34:8A2B:CE7E (talk) 18:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:37, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is another IP of this person, Special:Contributions/2409:40E1:1073:8531:2CB1:AFF:FE4B:B3FA. Grabup (talk) 18:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

It is a damn shame that you think you can block a person like me. You overestimate your power. But I must leave now. Unlike you, I have work tomorrow. But both of you should go outside once in a while and talk with real people.

Wikipedia is not a real place. I am worried about your mental health. Especially the admin guy, your judgement was a very BIG disappointment. Learn some manners, kid. 103.52.220.131 (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.